<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blair&#8217;s victory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bleedingheartshow.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/blairs-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bleedingheartshow.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/blairs-victory/</link>
	<description>The major every minor wants to be</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Ashton</title>
		<link>http://bleedingheartshow.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/blairs-victory/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bleedingheartshow.wordpress.com/?p=298#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Given the Conservative's informal coalition with the government over trust schools and academies, and their conscious flirtation with Swedish school vouchers, and also considering the major Conservative criticism of foundation hospitals was that they did not go far enough, I think Blair has a lot less to fear from the opposition when it comes to his legacy than he does from his own party...

It's terrible to contemplate, but perhaps a Cameron premiership's acceleration of the public service and welfare "reform" agendas would begin to convince Labour MPs in a way that left-wing and Liberal protests did not, that despite Co-operative Party enthusiasm, Blair's changes had les to do with empowerment and mutualism than they did with the need to reach out to private firms because of the financial straight-jacket New Labour inflicted on itself with the refusal to raise taxes on those most able to pay, or to tackle the continuing problem of tax evasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the Conservative&#8217;s informal coalition with the government over trust schools and academies, and their conscious flirtation with Swedish school vouchers, and also considering the major Conservative criticism of foundation hospitals was that they did not go far enough, I think Blair has a lot less to fear from the opposition when it comes to his legacy than he does from his own party&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s terrible to contemplate, but perhaps a Cameron premiership&#8217;s acceleration of the public service and welfare &#8220;reform&#8221; agendas would begin to convince Labour MPs in a way that left-wing and Liberal protests did not, that despite Co-operative Party enthusiasm, Blair&#8217;s changes had les to do with empowerment and mutualism than they did with the need to reach out to private firms because of the financial straight-jacket New Labour inflicted on itself with the refusal to raise taxes on those most able to pay, or to tackle the continuing problem of tax evasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
